S. Arunachalam

S. Arunachalam

Prof. S. Arunachalam is globally known for his expertise in Scientometrics and their use for assessing the research impact on a wide scale ranging from individuals and departments to institutions and countries.  His interests includes scientometrics, science policy, information science, public understanding of science, openness in scholarly communication, ICT for Development and rural knowledge centres and improving information access, both for scientists and for the rural poor. He is one of the earliest in the developing countries to use citation indexes to study developments in science and science policy. He was instrumental in CSIR, DBT and DST adopting Green open access as official policy.

Scientometrics

Scientometrics

Scientometrics

Scientometrics is the study of measuring and analyzing science, technology and innovation, which includes the measurement of impact, reference sets of articles to investigate the impact of journals and institutes, understanding of scientific citations, mapping scientific fields and the production of indicators for use in policy contexts. The Centre has an active working group on scientometrics with the focus on accessing how well Indian institutions perform in various fields of scientific research. The team, led by Prof. Subbiah Arunachalam (a globally renowned scientometrician), has developed a methodology for data-collecting and a general framework for studying the research performance of Indian institutions in various scientific disciplines. Through which, the Centre currently has on-going studies to evaluate the research performance of some of the major disciplines, such as chemistry, engineering, materials, astrophysics, mathematics, biological sciences, and physics.

 
 

STI Indicators and R&D Statistics

STI Indicators: Measuring STI is fundamental for the formulation of national innovation strategies.  Absence of “relevant” indicators is often considered a major obstacle for the design and implementation of STI policies in developing countries. The existing indicators are failing to serve their very own purpose in the policy – making process, because the existing indicators do not capture the relationship between STI activities and socioeconomic development. As a matter of fact, macro level indicators do not always reflect capabilities to achieve microlevel developmental targets.  The issues are becoming more cross-disciplinary in nature. The notion of linear relation between R&D activities (between R&D input and output) is vanishing and R&D as a process (input, output, outcome and impact) is becoming more and more of a complex system. The conventional STI indicators limit itself only to inputs and outputs; neglecting the monitoring of outcomes and impacts of STI process. The idea of harnessing the efforts in STI to achieve the development goals demands for new forms of indicators.  With this background, this work attempts to develop a conceptual framework for cross-cutting STI indicators interlaced between STI capabilities and developmental targets.

 

R&D Statistics are very important to formulate accurate indicators to monitor country’s R&D efforts. Accurate data-collection ensures reliability of the R&D indicators; and these indicators are very important to craft effective public policies. To produce R&D statistics, the methodology proposed by the OECD in the Frascati Manual (FM) is used extensively in both OECD and Non-OECD developing countries, even though it was originally written for R&D surveys in just OECD member countries. The characteristics of research systems in developing countries differ significantly from the OECD countries. Developing countries face problems when trying to apply the FM standards to the situation in their country. Hence, UNESCO Institute of Statistics (UIS) has come-up with an annex to FM – to provide suggestions on how the concepts in the FM should be interpreted to ensure that data better reflect the characteristics of R&D activity in developing countries while still maintaining international comparability. However, in Indian context, there are still several challenges related to R&D data, particularly in terms of its reliability, accessibility and availability. This study compares the R&D data-collection methodology in different countries to learn how the FM methodology is adapted in various national setups to construct their data-collection models to achieve reliable R&D statistics.

 

For more details, please contact, Prof. Subbiah Arunachalam, Prof. Abinandanan or M Madhan

Workshop on “Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy Research”, 11-13 December 2017

Workshop on “Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy Research”, 11-13 December 2017

Workshop on “Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy Research”
11-13 December 2017 | Biological Sciences Building, IISc, Bengaluru

Panel Discussion on Science, Technology, Innovation and its impact on Socio-economic Development

On December 12, 2017 at CES Seminar Hall, Third Floor, Biological Sciences Building, IISc, Bengaluru.

Please find the Poster for the event below.

 

Workshop on “Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy Research”

11-13 December 2017 | Biological Sciences Building, IISc, Bengaluru

The event is supported by Department of Science Technology (DST), Government of India, organized jointly by DST – Centre for Policy Research, IISc, Bengaluru, and Nation Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS), Bengaluru.

About the Workshop

Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) are now recognized as playing a significant role in advancing human, social, and economic development and meeting the aspirations of people and nations across the world. As a result, understanding STI processes and exploring ways to strengthen them is a major strand of intellectual activity, evinced by the explosion of literature on these topics in the last decade. At the same time, there are significant efforts to link this understanding to better policy-making by a range of governmental agencies (both in developed and emerging economies) and inter-governmental organizations. It is important to understand the inter-link between ‘science and public policy’; i.e., the use of scientific skills in formulating better policies (science for policy) as wee as understanding how the policies impact the science (policy for science). Department of Science and Technology (DST) recognized the importance of evidence-driven research and established DST Centers for Policy Research (CPRs) in various academic institutions across the country. These centers are engaged in targeted research in number of key areas relevant to the country, train young scholars in STI policy research, and contribute towards better STI policy making by providing inputs to DST.

The workshop intends to introduce various components, tools, methodologies and frameworks of STI policy research to young scholars working in this field, covering both; ‘science for policy’ and ‘policy for science’ related topics through series of lectures, invited talks and panel/group discussions. Also, this workshop aims to provide a deeper understanding about STI policy drafting and implementation mechanisms in India.

Please find the agenda attached : WSTIPR2017_Program

For more information, contact:

SECRETARIAT
WORKSHOP ON STI POLICY RESEARCH
DST – CENTRE FOR POLICY RESEARCH
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE.
BENGALURU – 560 012

+91-80-2293 2750/2066

chagunbasha@iisc.ac.in

Event on “Eugene Garfield and Scientometrics” Eugene Garfield in Memoriam, 30 Oct 2017

Event on “Eugene Garfield and Scientometrics” Eugene Garfield in Memoriam, 30 Oct 2017

Event on “Eugene Garfield and Scientometrics”

Eugene Garfield in Memoriam


, 30 Oct 2017

Dear all,

The DST-Centre for Policy Research at Indian Institute of Science is pleased to invite you to a half-day event on

“Eugene Garfield and Scientometrics”

Eugene Garfield in Memoriam

Faculty Hall, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

30 Oct 2017 | 10 am – 12.30 pm

This event is to celebrate the life and work of a man who not only had the imagination, pragmatic judgment, and immense energy required to invent, produce, and develop a useful tool for a seemingly routine but fundamental task in science, viz. searching the literature, but also had a deep intuitive sense of the social, cultural, and cognitive structures latent in the practice of science. With his visionary enthusiasm, Garfield saw in his creations a better science for society and the ideal of a unified body of knowledge accessible to all. The two speakers, between them, will cover the impact of the man and his work on science and scientists as well as on the way performance in science is evaluated. We will also get to hear about how Garfield evolved from humble beginnings to a businessman, scholar and a polymath. Come and listen to the fascinating story of the man whose creations have transformed the fabric of science.

Talks:

In Quest of the World Brain: The Life and Work of the Pragmatic Polymath Eugene Garfield

 by David A. Pendlebury

Eugene Garfield and His Impact on Science and Scientistsby P. Balaram

About the speakers:

David A. Pendlebury joined the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), now Clarivate Analytics, in 1983. He began as a translator and indexer and later worked with ISI’s founder Eugene Garfield on personal research projects. Until June 2004, Pendlebury was Manager of the department’s contract research services. He has served as Consulting Citation Analyst for Clarivate Analytics since 2006.

  1. Balaram is a former Director of Indian Institute of Science and a former Editor of Current Science. He is currently Emeritus Professor, Molecular Biophysics Unit, IISc, and DST Year of Science Chair Professor, NCBS, Bengaluru.

All are Welcome

Event Poster: E.Garfield and Scientometrics

Panel Discussion on “Institutional Open Access Policy”, 27 Oct 2017

Panel Discussion on “Institutional Open Access Policy”, 27 Oct 2017

Panel Discussion on “Institutional Open Access Policy”, 27 Oct 2017 

Dear all,

The DST-Centre for Policy Research at Indian Institute of Science is pleased to invite you to the

Panel Discussion

on 

“Institutional Open Access Policy”

What Universities and Administrators Can Do to Promote Open Access?

Faculty Hall, Indian Institute of Science

 27 Oct 2017 (Friday) | 4:00 pm – 5:30 pm

Open Access seeks to return scholarly publishing to its original purpose: to spread knowledge and allow that knowledge to be built upon.  Price barriers should not prevent students, researchers (or anyone) from getting access to research they need. Open Access, and the open availability and searchability of scholarly research that it entails, will have a significant positive impact on everything from education to the practice of medicine to the ability of entrepreneurs to innovate.

Panelists 

Prof. Satyajit Mayor (Director, The National Centre for Biological Sciences)

Prof. Jayant M. Modak (Deputy Director, Indian Institute of Science)

Mr. Sunil Abraham (Executive Director, Centre for Internet and Society)

Dr. Padmini Ray Murray (Vice-Chair, Global Outlook: Digital Humanities)

Mr. N V Sathyanarayana (Chairman & Managing Director, Informatics India Ltd)

Mr. Madhan Muthu (Visiting Scientist, DST-Centre for Policy Research, IISc)

All are Welcome

T. A. Abinandanan

T. A. Abinandanan

T. A. Abinandanan

Professor
abinand@iisc.ac.in

Prof. Abinandanan is the Coordinator of the DST-Centre for Policy Research and a professor in the Department of Materials Engineering at IISc. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in 1991 in Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science from Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA. After a post-doctoral stint in France, he has been on the faculty of the Indian Institute of Science since 1993.

Workshop on Dissertation Expectations and Quality Criteria: Is it Enough to have a Good Dissertation? 12 Jan 2016

Workshop on Dissertation Expectations and Quality Criteria: Is it Enough to have a Good Dissertation? 12 Jan 2016

Workshop on Dissertation Expectations and Quality Criteria: Is it Enough to have a Good Dissertation? 12 Jan 2016

Update: The list of selected students appears at the end.

* * *

The DST-CPR is pleased to announce a one-day Workshop entitled Dissertation Expectations and Quality Criteria: Is it Enough to have a Good Dissertation? to be held on 12 January 2016 (Tuesday). See below for a brief write-up about the Workshop.

The Workshop will be conducted by Prof. Maresi Nerad,  the founding director of the Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education (CIRGE) and Professor in the Leadership in Higher Education Program, College of Education, at the University of Washington, Seattle, USA. [Please see her website for more details].  Prof. Nerad will be at DST-CPR as a Visiting Professor during December 2015 – January 2016. She has presented this type of Workshops in Germany (in many universities), the US, South Africa, and the Middle East.

Here’s a brief description of the Workshop:

Dissertation Expectations and Quality Criteria: Is it Enough to have a Good Dissertation? 

How do we know when a dissertation is outstanding, passing, or not satisfying? 

Much discussion worldwide has been about what competencies (knowledge, skills, and experiences) doctorate candidates should develop, how they acquire them, and whether the next generation of researchers is appropriately prepared for careers inside and outside academe (see Lovitts 2007). Little attention has been given to the role of the dissertation and the criteria for its quality. This workshop aims at highlighting the expectations and quality criteria by doctoral candidates and their professors on what is an original piece of research.

This workshop will focus first on quality criteria identified by the participants, second on those identified in a recent study by professors, and third it will end by asking whether producing a good dissertation is enough these days and what other qualifications are indeed needed.

Who should attend:  PhD scholars who have completed at least 2 years of doctoral studies, who know what they will do in their dissertation.

Structure of the Workshop: It will be a very interactive workshop, and participation is limited to just 20. With an initial input from the Instructor, all other activities  are group work, reflections, brainstorming, and role play.

Selection will be made to ensure a diversity of backgrounds, fields of  study, and types of institutions.

There is no registration fee. Also, travel expenses will be reimbursed at the applicable rates. Limited accommodation is available for outstation participants.

Registration: Interested PhD scholars may file an application by filling all the details in this form. If you are selected, please bring along a letter from your advisor endorsing your participation in the Workshop.

Last date for filing the application: 5 January 2016.

For further enquiries, please send an e-mail to: chairman@apc.iisc.ernet.in

* * *

Update: Here is the First List of selected candidates (Additions to this list will be made later):

  1. Nimisha Agarwal [*], National Institute of Advanced Studies, Natural and Engineering Sciences
  2. Ajith Ashokan [*], IISER-Bhopal, Biological Sciences
  3. Aniket Basu Roy [*], IISc-Bangalore, Computer Science and Automation
  4. Sudarshan P Bhat [*], IISc, Ecological Sciences
  5. Jagriti Gangopadhyay [*], IIT-Gandhinagar, Humanities and Social Sciences
  6. V Vijay Girish K, IISc-Bangalore, Electrical Engineering
  7. Anupriya Gogna, IIIT-Delhi, Electronics and Communication Engineering
  8. Javed GS [*], IISc-Bangalore, Electrical Communication Engineering
  9. Smita Kamble [*], IISc-Bangalore, Materials Engineering
  10. Abhiruk Lahiri [*], IISc-Bangalore, Computer Science and Automation
  11. Mayamol T R [*], Academy of Medical sciences, Community Medicine
  12. Kanchan Mishra [*], TIFR-Mumbai, Homi Bhabha centre for Science Education
  13. Aishwarya Narayan [*], IIT-Bombay, Biosciences and Bioengineering
  14. Sudhir Pujahari [*], IISER-Pune, Mathematics
  15. Arijit Roy [*], IIT-Bombay, Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science
  16. Ankur Shringi [*], IISc-Bangalore, Ecological Sciences
  17. Vivek Srinivas [*], IIT-Bombay, Bioscience and Bioengineering
  18. Gaurav Tikas [*], IISc-Bangalore, Management Studies
  19. Amit Tripathi, IISc-Bangalore, Aerospace Engineering
  20. Asheesh Navneet [*], Institute for Social and Economic Change (Bangalore), Center for Political Institutions, Governance and Development
  21. Umesh Pratap Pandey [*], IISc-Bangalore, Inorganic and Physical Chemistry

Note: [*] indicates confirmed participants.

DST-CPR Discussion Series on Science for Policy & Policy for Science [Open Access Policy], 7 Jun 2017

DST-CPR Discussion Series on Science for Policy & Policy for Science  [Open Access Policy], 7 Jun 2017

DST-CPR Discussion Series on Science for Policy & Policy for Science [Open Access Policy]: 7 Jun 2017

DST-CPR Discussion Series on Science for Policy & Policy for Science  [Open Access Policy]: 7 Jun 2017 

Dear All, This is an open call for a meeting on “Science for Policy & Policy forScience” discussion. The topic of discussion for the upcoming meeting on7th of June is *Open Access Policy*.  Date   : 07-06-2017Day    : WednesdayTime   : 5:30 PMVenue  : The Seminar Hall, DST-CPR, Archives and Publications Cell, IISc Bangalore.Contact person: 8248169895email ID: chagun@apc.iisc.ernet.in Expert Panelists:       1. Subbaiah Arunachalam (Professor. DST-CPR-IISc);                        2. Francis Jayakanth (IISc, Bangalore);                        3. Madhan Muthu (Visiting Scientist, DST-CPR-IISc) Discussion Focus: Why Open Access is important to Science, particularly inIndia? When researchers publish their works in journals and conferenceproceedings, they would want their works to be read, cited, and built uponby as wide an audience as possible. Much of the scientific publicationsare being published by commercial publishers. Subscription costs of suchpublications are very high, constantly increasing, and beyond the means ofmost of the libraries. The high subscription costs create an accessbarrier to the scientific literature because of which the publications donot get the kind of visibility that the researchers would like to have.The lack of adequate visibility will reduce the potential impact of thepublications. This in turn could affect the advancement of knowledge. Itis therefore imperative that the access barrier to scientific literaturecreated because of high subscription costs should be overcome and thiscould be achieved through OA publishing. More Details: Open Access in India: Q&A with Prof. Subbiah Arunachalam(http://bit.ly/2qPXheE)  All are cordially invited to attend. PS: This is part of the policy discussion series scheduled for *first andthird Wednesday of every month*

Poster_OA_7_June_17

Seminar on ORCID, 9 Nov 2015

Seminar on ORCID, 9 Nov 2015

Seminar on ORCID, 09 Nov 2015

Seminar on ORCID, 09 Nov 2015

DST – Centre for Policy Research
&
Archives and Publications Cell
invite you to a Seminar on

ORCID Status & Updates

by

Ms. Nobuko Miyairi
(Regional Director, Asia Pacific, ORCID)

at 3:30 p.m. on 9 November 2015 (Monday) in Golden Jubilee Hall, Department
of Electrical Communiction Engineering


Abstract

ORCID [*] started its registry service in October 2012. I will introduce what ORCID is, and the progress made in the past three years. ORCID is not only a system to disambiguate researcher names with persistent identifiers, but also a global community effort to allow member organizations to implement authenticated workflows in handling researcher names and their work. The presentation will illustrate various ORCID adoptions to assist IISc in considering possible integrations of ORCID in your systems.

http://orcid.org
[*] ORCID: Open Researcher and Contributor ID